The Basics Behind Reading Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder By Rebekah Bosley M.S. CCC-SLP, Speech Language Pathology Trainee

Reading is an activity that has been around for thousands of years and is an integral part of our daily lives. For example, children like to have their favorite storybooks read to them by their caregivers, adults read fiction and non-fiction books for pleasure and work, and college students read textbook after textbook because it is a requirement of being a student. Much goes into teaching an individual how to read; just ask your local elementary teacher. However, unless you are a clinical interventionist, you may not know that reading can be used as an intervention tool to help individuals increase proficiency in language skills such as receptive and expressive vocabulary, comprehension, and language growth. Some speech-language pathologists use storybook reading to target specific speech sounds (see Speech Time Fun's Blog). In this blog, we will focus on a specific reading intervention: Reading to Engage Children with Autism in Language and Learning (RECALL).

Dialogic reading is an interactive style of reading in which the adult works to actively engage the child in storybook interaction. This was originally discussed and researched in the 1980s to 1990s by Dr. Whitehurst and colleagues (Arnold et al., 1994; G. J. Whitehurst et al., 1988; Grover J. Whitehurst et al., 1994). A recent systematic review by Towson and colleagues (2021) found that SIBR overall produced positive improvements in language and communication outcomes in the following populations: children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD; Fleury et al., 2014; Fleury & Schwartz, 2017; Whalon et al., 2013, 2015, 2016), children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities such as Down syndrome (DS; Quinn et al., 2020), children with Developmental Delay (DD; Towson et al., 2016) and children with speech and/or language impairment (Wilcox et al., 2020).

Dr. Kelly Whalon and colleagues (Whalon et al., 2015) created a modified version of the dialogic reading intervention called Reading to Engage Children with Autism in Language and Learning (RECALL). RECALL incorporates the hallmark features of dialogic reading, including the CROWD (Completion, Recall, Open-ended, Wh-, and Recall) questions and the PEEP (Prompt, Evaluate, Expand, and Praise) sequence. In addition, the novel features of RECALL include adding two additional question types (Wh-Inference and Emotion Identification), initiation bids, joint attention bids, and a prompting hierarchy. The additional questions, bids, and prompting hierarchy were developed to target areas of difficulty for children with ASD.

The prompting hierarchy was developed with a least-to-most prompting strategy in mind for the child with ASD and included answer options with visuals. For example, the least-to-most prompting hierarchy in which the question (e.g., "What is the dog doing?") is initially asked by the interventionist. If the child with ASD gives no response or an incorrect response (e.g., the correct answer is "running"), then three visuals are provided to help aid in answering the question and the question is asked again (e.g., "What is the dog doing?"). The visuals might include a picture or clip art of a dog running, sleeping, or eating. If the child with ASD does not answer the question, the interventionist continues through the prompting hierarchy by removing visuals as they progress through the hierarchy.

RECALL has since been applied to parents (Whalon et al., 2016) and in a randomized control trial  (Lo & Shum, 2021). More research is needed to determine at what age and frequency RECALL will be effective for children with ASD. Therefore, if you are an interventionist, I recommend looking into the Lo & Shum, 2021 and Whalon et al., 2013, 2015, 2016 studies to see if RECALL might be an effective intervention method for your caseload. Likewise, if you are a parent, I recommend speaking with your interventionist to see if RECALL might be a possibility for your child with ASD.

By: Rebekah Bosley M.S. CCC-SLP, Speech Language Pathology Trainee, Ph.D. Student in Speech Hearing Science Department at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign


References

Arnold, D. H., Lonigan, C. J., Whitehurst, G. J., & Epstein, J. N. (1994). Accelerating Language Development Through Picture Book Reading: Replication and Extension to a Videotape Training Format. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.235

Fleury, V. P., Miramontez, S. H., Hudson, R. F., & Schwartz, I. S. (2014). Promoting active participation in book reading for preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A preliminary study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013514069

Fleury, V. P., & Schwartz, I. S. (2017). A Modified Dialogic Reading Intervention for Preschool Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121416637597

Lo, J. Y. T., & Shum, K. K. M. (2021). Brief Report: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of RECALL (Reading to Engage Children with Autism in Language and Learning) for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(6), 2146–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04692-0

Quinn, E. D., Kaiser, A. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2020). Teaching preschoolers with down syndrome using augmentative and alternative communication modeling during small group dialogic reading. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0017

Towson, J. A., Gallagher, P. A., & Bingham, G. E. (2016). Dialogic Reading: Language and Preliteracy Outcomes for Young Children With Disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 38(4), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116668643

Whalon, K., Delano, M., & Hanline, M. F. (2013). A Rationale and Strategy for Adapting Dialogic Reading for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: RECALL. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2012.672347

Whalon, K., Hanline, M. F., & Davis, J. (2016). Parent Implementation of RECALL : A Systematic Case Study. Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(2), 211–220.

Whalon, K., Martinez, J. R., Shannon, D., Butcher, C., & Hanline, M. F. (2015). The Impact of Reading to Engage Children With Autism in Language and Learning (RECALL). Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121414565515

Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., & et al. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.24.4.552

Whitehurst, Grover J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). A Picture Book Reading Intervention in Day Care and Home for Children From Low-Income Families. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.679

Wilcox, M. J., Gray, S., & Reiser, M. (2020). Preschoolers with developmental speech and/or language impairment: Efficacy of the Teaching Early Literacy and Language (TELL) curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.10.005

 

The exclusionary criteria and the bridge between Intellectual Disabilities and Serious Mental Illness by Magdelene Thebaud, Social Work Trainee

As an MSW student intern, I have been given the opportunity to do my clinical practice in an inpatient psych department. Here we see medically cleared patients that were referred from the ER who have ‘Serious Mental Illness.’ According to the American Psychiatric Association “Serious Mental Illness (SMI) is defined as someone over the age of 18 who has (or had within the past year) a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder that causes serious functional impairment that substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities.”

Hospitals and agencies all have their requirements and “exclusionary criteria” as to whom they can admit into their departments. Sometimes these exclusionary criteria can seem to be non-inclusive of patients who need that help most. Often times, individuals with intellectual disabilities are excluded from receiving the care that they need because of their mental health problems are not due to a brain chemical imbalance but by a behavioral problem. I experienced seeing individuals get turned away from mental health assistance because the medical professionals could not treat their behaviors with medication. This type of perspective limits the care and needs for those who do have intellectual disabilities and a serious mental illness. In Illinois, there are even laws made that make sure that these exclusionary criteria are not imposed.

“(405 ILCS 5/2-100) (from Ch. 91 1/2, par. 2-100)
    Sec. 2-100. (a) No recipient of services shall be deprived of any rights, benefits, or privileges guaranteed by law, the Constitution of the State of Illinois, or the Constitution of the United States solely on account of the receipt of such services.
    (b) A person with a known or suspected mental illness or developmental disability shall not be denied mental health or developmental services because of age, sex, race, religious belief, ethnic origin, marital status, physical or mental disability or criminal record unrelated to present dangerousness.
(Source: P.A. 86-1416.)”

However, it still is not applied in all the different agencies. How do we “check” these agencies that they don’t decline individuals because of their intellectual disabilities if they present with a mental health problem.

Part of the research that I get to partake in the LEND fellowship is bridging the gap between intellectual disabilities and mental health. Cognitive behavioral therapy has a history of not addressing the needs of individuals who have autism. Honestly, there is just a serious lack of research on these populations and mental health in general. Working with Dr. Kristin Berg on the BEST project, our research team gets to provide workshops to families with children with disabilities and a mental illness.

Resources

What is Serious Mental Illness? | SMI Adviser

https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=040500050HCh%2E+II&ActID=1496&ChapterID=0&SeqStart=5000000&SeqEnd=8000000

Benefits and Considerations of Increased Telehealth as a Result of COVID-19 by Morgan Stutts, Psychology Trainee

When I first realized the majority of my clinical placement was going to be done virtually, I was disappointed. After my last year had been spent entirely on Zoom, I was so tired of the idea of spending even more time meeting virtually. I had also been excited to develop in-person connections, and the idea of telehealth was daunting. However, both through my program and of telehealth programs more broadly, I had heard that the use of telehealth this past year had allowed for meeting with individuals that may not have otherwise been seen, for a variety of different barriers of accessibility. So, with both my fear and optimism, I began my first attempt at telehealth.

Since beginning my clinical practicum in autism assessment, not only have my nerves about providing virtual healthcare settled for the most part, but my appreciation for telehealth has also increased immensely. The switch to Zoom appointments has provided the opportunity to connect with patients who would typically not consider visiting us hours away, to attend appointments, in addition to lessening the burden that attending multiple appointments may add for individuals and families. And while I often encounter situations where I feel something may be much easier to do in person, I am so grateful that this option can be provided to those who benefit from it.

In reflecting on my own personal experiences this semester, I’ve thought more about virtual healthcare more broadly and what the future of telehealth may be. The rise in telemedicine has resulted in increased access to services that individuals may not be able to otherwise receive.

However, while there is already a myriad of barriers to accessing healthcare — difficulties with obtaining transportation, having childcare, and limited providers nearby1,2 — telehealth brings additional barriers. To engage in such virtual appointments, individuals typically need access to devices and Wi-Fi. Virtual appointments have created opportunities for individuals to attend meetings that may not otherwise be feasible, however providers will have to keep in mind these novel barriers when engaging in telehealth services. I am hopeful and excited to see how the use of virtual appointments will lead to increased accessibility in the future.

1 Ahmed, S. M., Lemkau, J. P., Nealeigh, N., & Mann, B. (2001). Barriers to healthcare access in a non‐elderly urban poor American population. Health & Social Care in the Community9(6), 445-453.

2 Brems, C., Johnson, M. E., Warner, T. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2006). Barriers to healthcare as reported by rural and urban interprofessional providers. Journal of Interprofessional Care20(2), 105-118.

Regina, Always Liked You Best by Kayleigh Geisse, Physical Therapy Trainee

After an exhausting day, I walk into my parents’ house and I am instantly greeted by three rambunctious dogs, hungry for both food and attention. I let the dogs out and I watch them chase an unsuspecting squirrel in vain. Suddenly, I hear a low whine from the back of the house. Confused, I go to investigate. As I get closer to the bedrooms, the faint whine becomes the distinct sob of someone in pain. I pick up my pace; somehow, I know the source of the noise. I throw open the door, sprinting in, and I see Regina prone on the ground, a thin stream of blood flowing down the side of her face where her now broken glasses had once been, her walker just out of reach. I try my best not to cry as I help her up and back into bed.

My older sister, Regina, was diagnosed with Huntington’s Disease (HD) as I was finishing high school. As a progressive neurodegenerative disease, her symptoms were initially mild and while she moved back into my parents’ house, I left for another city to study Psychology. I had casually researched the disease, so I knew the facts: her life expectancy after diagnosis was short and her cognitive, physical, and functional abilities would eventually decline to a point where she would be confined to a bed, unable to speak. By the time I graduated college, her symptoms had worsened; she was struggling to walk on her own, and she was using a rollator walker for all her daily activities. At the time, my mother was her only caregiver, so I made the decision to move home to help as my sister continued to lose her independence. I spent the first few month’s volunteering at the Indianapolis Humane Society while learning more about HD and what my sister’s future held. I saw the frustration and the agony in her eyes when she had to ask me, her younger sister, to help her use the bathroom and perform simple daily tasks. I did my best to help her, but as the months progressed, I began to feel increasingly underqualified and ill-equipped to assist. I became frustrated myself because I did not have the tools necessary to help my own sister.

While HD has no cure, there are benefits of a therapeutic regimen to manage physical symptoms and improve quality of life. We began to reach out to home health aides, mobile physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech pathologists to help with those daily tasks. In the months that followed, a team of healthcare professionals were at our house daily, and I saw each one of them work tirelessly to help Regina as her cognitive abilities continued to decline. Over time, Regina began to repeatedly ask about a specific provider, Sergio. Each morning, she would start the day by asking if “Sergio the PT” was coming today. On the days he did come, she would brag endlessly about how far she had walked with him or for how long she could stand up. On those days, her mood elevated tremendously, her pain lessened, and she was able to sleep through the night. Undoubtedly, Sergio has been able to prolong her independence and improve the quality of her everyday life.

This led to several conversations with Sergio about his profession - how improving the daily lives of others has helped him live a more fulfilled life himself. I began to explore physical therapy along with other health care professions, continually thinking about Sergio’s impact on Regina. Every visit, Regina continues to praise Sergio. Even with her continued declining abilities, his effect on her life is ever-present. Despite time spent with physician assistants, veterinarians, and other providers, I consistently returned to the impact that a physical therapist has on the lives of their patients, and the relationships formed during the therapeutic process. I knew where I belonged in the realm of heath care.

I have always had a strong desire to help people which led me to study psychology in undergraduate, providing me with a unique understanding of others’ thought patterns and behaviors. Returning to take outstanding undergraduate DPT prerequisites in a new city presented novel challenges demanding that I strike a balance between work, familial obligations, and studies. While studying psychology, I discovered that I am a verbal and visual learner, thus finding a solid support network from my new professors and fellow returning students including forming informal study groups was pivotal to my success. My specific fascination in human anatomy and physiology evident, I was granted the opportunity to teach a human physiology laboratory class the following semester. More than I thought I would, I loved teaching and being able to share my knowledge with others. Promoting a student’s growth in their medical education by facilitating the lightbulb moment of fully comprehending the complexities of difficult concepts, like cardiology, has been one of the most rewarding experiences.

Every sit to stand, every transfer to the toilet, every spoonful of food I assist with, Regina utters a soft, yet sweet “thank you.” Whilst seemingly miniscule of tasks, these gratitude’s have become increasingly meaningful. Caring for a family member with a disability teaches patience, humility, and altruism. It truly makes you appreciate one’s independence and prolonging it. These qualities are necessary for success for any healthcare profession but specifically important to connect with patients in the physical therapy field. To me, becoming a physical therapist provides an opportunity for continual personal growth and medical education to help diagnose, promote movement, reduce pain, restore function, prevent further disability, educate, and help those in need. Through each PT shadowing opportunity, I discover new branches of physical therapy that I am eager to pursue. I am excitedly navigating through DPT school to determine which path will allow me to most benefit others by prioritizing a caring patient relationship and providing the best therapy to patients like Regina for whom it means so much.

Above are two pictures of two sisters, one standing with long curly brown hair and one seated with short straight brown hair, feeding a giraffe a carrot.

Respect for Individual Identity through the use of Language in Clinical Practice by Julia Clearman, Psychology Trainee

Not long ago, I sat in the back of a classroom listening to a student lecture on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). My view from the back of the classroom gave me a sort of observational vantage point in which I could take in individual reactions and notice how other students responded to the information being shared. The student speaker had obviously done a considerable amount of preparation for the lecture and shared statistics about etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and such. However, I still felt myself begin to bristle internally. This well-intending student was following a deficiency-based language to discuss Autistic individuals. Language usage in this way had a distancing effect between those carrying a diagnostic label and everyone else. As I shifted uncomfortably in my seat, I wondered why the language that was being used was so off-putting to me and how I had come to understand the strengths-based approach when considering disability. 

Early on in the IL-LEND experience, we reviewed the use of language using a person-first or identity-first model when engaging in conversations with and about disabled people. There were several different ways of considering these other models. Individuals seemed to prefer one way or another depending on how it was used, for what purpose it was used, and what type of tone the language was presented in. The takeaway, however, was that different individuals had different preferences for using either a person-first or identity-first model when discussing disability. 

After these early experiences in IL-LEND with the person-first or identity-first model, I called up a close friend with a disability. 

“Sarah (pseudonym),” I exclaimed, “you have to tell me what you think about these models!” 

After some discussion, my friend dropped some golden wisdom that has stuck with me ever since.

“Well,” she said, “I guess I prefer person-first language when other people are discussing my disability with me. It is obvious that I have a disability when you look at me, but I am not just my disability. There is so much a part of me that is not my disability.”

We discussed more details about her lived experience with a disability and the reactions and words she has had to endure over the years. When I hung up the phone, I walked away with two deep impressions. First, the use of language matters. Language is linked to identity and has the power to be positive and/or discriminatory. Second, the use of person-first or identity-first language seems to differ across disabilities and individualized preferences.

So, as I sat in the back of that classroom thinking about my IL-LEND experience, person-first or identity-first language, and the honest conversation I had with my friend about the lived experience of disability, I realized that I was upset with the lecture because the language being used lacked respect for those carrying an identity of ASD. Also, I recognized the power of language choice again. 

These experiences and feelings got me thinking. Here I am, in a doctoral program in a health-related discipline, and the language choices I select influence those around me – not only my patients but also my fellow clinicians-in-training, colleagues, and community. 

What would it look like to build into my clinical practice, community engagement, and/or individual conversational exchanges a purposeful language of respect and consideration of person-first or identity-first choices? 

How could I shape my own use of language to understand individual preferences as I grow into a practicing clinician?

While I am still working out exactly how these questions can be answered in my daily exchanges, the point is that I am continuing to work out answers to these questions and carefully watch my own use of language to be more respectful to those with disabilities. 

What would healthcare look like if we all committed to this change?

 

- JC

 

More resources:

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-03427-001

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6371927/

 

 

Why isn’t LEND a part of all Pre-Health Professional Schooling? By Claudia Piatek, Physical Therapy Trainee

I was ecstatic when I received the news that I was chosen to be one of the LEND trainees from my discipline, Physical Therapy. I am interested in going into the Pediatric PT field thus LEND seemed like an amazing program that would gear me with additional information and resources about working with children/ individuals with various disabilities that I would undoubtedly work with upon completion of my schooling. However, when I say “additional information and resources,” at this point I mean “only” information and resources.

Having been in LEND for almost a whole semester and almost completing my pediatric PT course, I am stunned by how little overlap there has been with information shared in LEND and in that course. LEND has taught me an immense amount that I would never have known had I just taken this pediatric PT course. We have had just one guest lecture about school-based PT in which IEPs were discussed in very little detail, while in LEND we have received a wealth of IEP information as well as done case studies on different IEPs. We have had no lecture about language and what type of language to use with parents of and patients who may be neurodiverse or physically disabled.  In fact, I don’t think that I have seen or heard the terms neurodiverse or neurotypical used in any of our lectures. Instead, they are populated with language such as “normal” vs “abnormal.” While this may be necessary in the PT field to make comparisons and come up with interventions, it is not overtly stated for other members of my cohort that this type of language should not be used with parents and children. Thankfully, we had a speaker talk about the “strengths based approach/language”  in LEND and this has emphasized the importance of positive language for me I will make this a priority in my practice moving forward.

By writing this I am not trying to talk down on my program. It is a great program and I have been learning so much. In my program and other PT programs across the country, there is definitely room for improvement especially considering there are other students who are interested in pediatric PT, but are not a part of LEND. They may not learn some of the information that I’ve learned until they are on the job, or they may never learn it, which would put them and their patients at a disadvantage. Regardless, I am extremely grateful for being in LEND, and wish that this wealth of extremely important information and resources was more accessible for other students in pre-health programs, whether they know they have an interest in it or not.

 

Culture Brokers: Bridging the Gap between Culturally, Linguistically, Economically, Diverse (CLED) families with children with dis/abilities and Special Education services

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/top-aerial-view-famous-golden-bridge-1926545249

(Picture: containing sky, outdoor, mountains, and bridge being held up by hands)

It has been a little over 50 years since the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) allowed individuals of color to intermingle and learn alongside their white peers in public education institutions in the United States. Similarly, special education has only been officially around for a little under 50 years since the passing of the All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (EAHCA; renamed IDEA in 1990) which provided opportunities for individuals with dis/abilities to attend public schooling and receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE). Within those 50 years, the U.S. educational system has played both the intricate role of protagonist and antagonist in providing special education services to children with dis/abilities and their families who are also individuals of color (Harry, 2008).

Currently, students from Culturally, Linguistically, Economically, Diverse (CLED) communities make up around 50% of students receiving Special Education services in the public education system (OSEP, 2018) Schools and districts are tasked with providing the essential resources and support for the growing population of students from CLED communities in Special Education. Yet, this population of individuals and their families have been overwhelmingly understudied and under resourced.

The solution for bridging the disconnection between these two systems, Culture Brokers! Individuals working toward supporting CLED families as they navigate the education system and their intersectionality of being people of color, from varying cultures, who speak different languages, with disabilities (Mortier et. al, 2020). Cultural brokering is an intervention that supports “any advocate who engages in the purposeful act of connecting people of differing cultural backgrounds to improve collaboration” (Rosetti, et. al, 2018).

Through Culture Brokers, communities can begin developing a foundation for relationship building of partnerships with all stakeholders (families, school professionals, policy makers, etc.) with students as the focal point! Cultural Brokers can facilitate resources, conversations, and advocacy for families who require the support. Cultural brokers can translate paperwork, interpret at meetings, find local resources and agencies, be a support system, help navigate the IEP process, explain safeguards and rights, and communicate with school professionals. Anyone can become a cultural broker with appropriate training in Special Education services (e.g., Volunteer Advocacy Project) as well as Cultural sensitivity and responsiveness (e.g., Trauma-informed, Courageous Conversations, BeWelltools). Other skills that can benefit cultural brokering: 1) fluency (written and verbal) in the native languages spoken, 2) familiarity with the community and its’ members, 3) self-reflection of one’s own biases and strengths.

by Special Ed Trainee, Edwin Monárrez

Resources:

https://sites.ed.gov/idea/osep-fast-facts-race-and-ethnicity-of-children-with-disabilities-served-under-idea-part-b/

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)

Mortier, K., Brown, I. C., & Aramburo, C. M. (2021). Cultural brokers in special education.

Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920975386

Rossetti, Z., Redash, A., Sauer, J. S., Bui, O., Wen, Y., & Regensburger, D. (2018).

Access, accountability, and advocacy: Culturally and linguistically diverse families’ participation in IEP meetings. Exceptionality. Advance online publication. 19 June. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2018.1480948

 

 

Spectrum (T1DM): How Research Can Help Autistic Children with Type 1 Diabetes by Annanda Batista, Nursing Trainee

In 2017, I started my Ph.D. application process, and my focus was only on self-management support for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Meanwhile, I was watching a TV show called “Parenthood,” and the story of Max Braverman touched me. The autism storyline follows the family’s journey to accept Max’s diagnosis and support him while dealing with their own emotions. The show focuses on life with a developmental disability. It changed the route of my Ph.D. proposal. I began to think about the challenges of autistic children or adolescents to manage type 1 diabetes (TID).

I started to search in the scientific literature about this population. There was no article in any database about autistic children and T1D. How would I justify my research topic if there is no scientific publication on this topic? A reflection came to my mind: a scientist needs to go to the population to know their needs better when no data is available. It is not only articles published in journals that provide validation of a topic; it is also the population or individuals themselves. Thus, I began my search for blogs and support groups on social media and found families with autistic children with type 1 diabetes that were forgotten by the scientific community.

This population needed healthcare professionals that knew both conditions. During our conversations, mothers reported that their children faced unique challenges in managing T1D because of their social communication challenges of autism, such as self-care related to the insulin application and regulation, diet change, knowing and asking for help in hypo and hyperglycemia, and health education. Building a trustful relationship with healthcare providers is also a challenge because these professionals did not provide educational orientations about both conditions together.. I realized that these reports would be my justification. They are important! This population needed attention.

Therefore, my Ph.D. proposal focuses on identifying the self-management needs of autistic youth with T1D and ASD in order to develop new technologies to meet needs of both these conditions. Research is done to help communities to improve their health and ask them what they need. Knowing what the population really needs is essential as well as any report in a published article. Researchers need to be closer to their study population.

Occupational therapy—what is that? By Mackenzie Jaekel, OTR/L

I am an occupational therapist (OT) and I am passionate about what I do. However, I’m aware that a lot of people don’t know exactly WHAT it is I do. I spent a good deal of graduate school explaining to my loved ones “no, I am not a physical therapist, no, I don’t just help kids find jobs, no, I won’t look at your arthritis in your hands, and no I am not just the handwriting lady”. But it isn’t their fault that they have trouble keeping it straight. OT is an incredibly broad field that works with a multitude of populations and settings. In addition, the definition of occupation according to Oxford language dictionary, is “a job or profession”. It’s not as descriptive a name as say a firefighter or, yes, a physical therapist.

So what is OT? The key to this question lies in the more niche definition of occupation, defined by the field of OT as “Everyday personalized activities that people do to occupy time and bring meaning and purpose to life” (AOTA, 2020). While occupations, according to OT, do include work or job tasks, they also include brushing your teeth, reading a book, and driving a car. Occupational therapists then help people do these meaningful activities, or occupations, when challenges or barriers prevent their completion, for example, in the presence of disability.

For example, I work in the school system with kids who have trouble with one or more “occupations” during their school day including but not limited to handwritten homework, ordering lunch, and playing on the playground. This usually requires me to do a task analysis to decide what the barriers are to the activity and whether we can modify or change the environment, the task itself, or a person factor to overcome that barrier.

So yes, an OT may work with a transition age student to find a job placement in the community. Yes, an OT might co-treat with a physical therapist or treat arthritis if motor difficulties are impacting everyday activities. And yes, an OT may work on handwriting because it impacts a child’s participation in the classroom. If you want more information, make sure and ask your friendly neighborhood OT or check out the resources below! We know it can be confusing, trust me, you will not be the first one to ask. 

Pictured above are five frosted cookies in a circle decorated with a brain, a rainbow infinity sign, a wheelchair symbol with a heart instead of a wheel, plants, and adaptive equipment. In the middle is a 6th cookie that says OT. Cookies made and photo taken by me, Mackenzie Jaekel (baking is one of my favorite occupations).

Cooking and Mental Health do Mix by Ghada Abdalla, Social Work Trainee

As a young, energetic mother, I felt unstoppable, that I could do anything and deal with any challenge that I faced, but no one prepared me for the effect of harsh words about my child and my choices in raising him. Or the lack of resources.

While I used to work with families challenged with Autism, being on the receiving end of the diagnosis gave me a completely different perspective and a tremendous insight. I remember the day that the therapist said, “he is too fast for any information to sink in; there is nothing that I can do with him.” I was puzzled and wondering what I would do now. I tried a behavior approach to get to my child, but he was not that interested at that young age. I searched for other things like changing his diet and did not notice any change.

 Then I remembered that one of my best conversations with my mom was when we were cooking, so that is what I did.

Cooking was one of the most valuable things that worked with my son that slowed down his ADHD and cooled down his Autism. Cooking was the only time we could have some verbal communication, the only time he was listening. Incorporating the behavior aspect and speech was great and had a great outcome. He still has things that he can’t touch and food that he can’t smell. But even with these challenges, it is still so rewarding. From my experience, I had to keep track of what smell to avoid and how the light should be, what he can tolerate, and whatnot. While I was searching, I found two excellent websites that explain what to do with each of the challenges.

https://thewebaddicted.com/lifestyle/improve-life-and-social-skills-in-the-kitchen/

https://orkidideas.com/cooking-skills-children-with-autism-sensory-issues/

 I started to bake with him to make our cookies and pasta, our pastry, and treats. Even asking friends to come and we can describe what we are doing, how it feels and what we can smell. I even found out now that some support groups do the same thing.

 In this video, they are talking about this experience. What did I cook? 

Autism and Cooking: A Sensory Experience

I researched more about it and found some research on this subject and the positive effect of cooking on children, especially children with Autism. There are many benefits of cooking with children with Autism, such as facilitating social-emotional development, practicing fine motor and executive functioning skills, and improve a variety of food choices. I also found two websites that talk about the benefits of cooking for people with Autism. It helps strengthen their social and emotional development by allowing them to socialize and build a connection with others over food. Cooking also enhances their fine motor skills while they are slicing, stirring, and kneading the dough. Also, it exposes them to a different variety of food choices, and it improves their ability to follow directions, whether it is verbal or writing. And last cooking teaches the importance of cleanliness.

In this journey, I found joy in spending time cooking with my children, and I hope that you do too. 

Resources about cooking: 

https://www.cookingautism.org/about

https://www.sdautismhelp.com/blog-autism-special-needs/4-benefits-of-cooking-with-your-child-with-autism[AK4] 

 

 

 

GHADA ABDALLA

 

A Call to Action: Disability Justice in a Social Work World by Social Work Trainee, Nahime Aguirre Mtanous

This week, I began my last year in my Master’s in Social Work (MSW) program at the University of Chicago’s Crown Family School of Social Work. In my time there, I have been able to lend disability justice, culture, and advocacy efforts to social work scholarship easily. And yet, the field of social work has yet to adopt disability justice pedagogy to its curriculum. With the rise of racial unrest of the 2010s to now, we have seen the social work profession work to align itself as radical by adopting anti-racist and decolonization strategies in its curriculum. Among these ideas, radical social work also teaches the importance of understanding how hypersegregation and resource inequality play a part in the development of people. Furthermore, the ideas of a livable wage and housing security are taught to future social workers to illustrate the goals that contemporary activists work to achieve the goals of a social work education.

All of these different pieces of social justice work taught to MSW students aim to help students understand the populations that regularly seek supports without specific instruction on how they interact with the disability community. People with disabilities are at higher risks of needing social justice work in receiving services. How can MSW students hope to do actual social justice work if their education does not teach them the intersection of all the previous components by centering disability justice education?

The disability community is rich in examples of how people performing radical social work can truly provide supports for disabled folk. Social workers are already taught how to function in interdisciplinary teams; shouldn’t they also know about how to provide care coordination in anti-ableist ways? As disability activism shifts from a disability rights framework into seeking anti-capitalist disability justice, shouldn’t social workers know how to work within those frameworks? Shouldn’t social workers know how to apply anti-oppressive practices that disabled people have and continue to experience through an educational approach instead of a #FreeBritney Twitter thread detailing the lack of bodily autonomy adults with disabilities experience?

Special topics within the disability community like right to marry, benefits determinations, subminimum wage work, etc., should be a required curriculum component that future social workers should not miss in their education. All social workers should be able to help support the self-determination of people with disabilities in order to provide anti-ableist disability justice.

Premature Infants and Parent Reactions by Johana Machuca, SLP Trainee

Last week on one of my rounds, a student described the case of Patient A, who was born at 32 weeks gestation. We went over when speech therapy took place, what happened during treatment, and some of the improvements being made by the baby. I remember feeling upset about all the things the baby was missing by being in an incubator such as not being exposed to language and being overstimulated by all of the noise coming from the incubators. Still, the one thing that affected me the most was when a student asked the presenter how present the parents were in this interaction, whether by phone or in person. The presenter’s response: they were not present at all.

I felt frustrated and upset that the parents would not go see or call to check up on their baby. I know I am not a parent, but I have a sister who was born prematurely at 33 weeks when I was 15. My parents would leave every morning to go to the hospital every day for two months straight to see her for a couple of hours. I talked to my mom about the rounds presentation, and she mentioned how a week after giving birth, the doctors were going to perform a different procedure on my sister. My dad was at work and could not take my mother, so she got on a bus and walked the rest of the way to the hospital. The doctor commented on how a family member of my sister had shown up within a few hours. He then pointed to all the other babies in the room and mentioned how none of the parents had visited or even called to see how their babies were. Not even called to check-in to see how their baby was doing. 

I know that these are just two occasions in which parents have not been present, and it should not be generalized to everyone, yet I still think about all of the babies who do not have their parents' support. There is not much research about the interaction of parental visits in the NICU, but I was able to find common parent reactions to the NICU. Reactions summarized in the article healthychildren.org (cited at the bottom) include…

- Fear of the unknown

o   Parents might feel uncomfortable with the NICU environment, or they might fear what their families think about the birth. 

- Anger 

o   Parents might feel angry at the hospital staff or at not having the birth experience that they expected. 

- Guilt

o   Parents might ask what they did to cause this? Or how they could have prevented this.     

- Loss

o   Not having a full-term infant may lead to feelings of loss of what was expected. They might also feel the loss regarding the parenting role. 

- Powerlessness

o   They feel like they cannot do anything for their baby as their baby is surrounded by the high-tech technology.

- And Feeling on Display

o   Parents might feel like a fish in a tank since in the NICU, one is usually sharing space in a large room.

This has allowed me to empathize more with parents and comprehend more of what they are going through. The thought of parents not visiting their little ones still upsets me, but I try to think about how the parents are feeling and the toll having a baby in the NICU is taking on them.

 

For more information regarding common parent reactions:

https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/baby/preemie/Pages/Common-Parent-Reactions-to-the-NICU.aspx

 

For research regarding parental visits in the NICU:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/485877

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3700586/  

 

 

A call for thorough shoveling…and enforcement of the ADA by Sarah Weldy, OT Trainee

Personally, I have never felt quite so humbled as when I had to think about curb cuts for the first time. Have you ever had to think about curb cuts? What is a curb cut, you ask? You know, where the curb…cuts down so the sidewalk meets the street without the bump of the curb. Here, I’ll just show you:

sarah1.jpg

Curb cuts are well and good, because they make the sidewalk accessible to someone in a wheelchair or using a walker. Fantastic, right? The bad news is that in the cold Chicago winters, this tends to happen:

sarah2.jpg

Rarely does someone shoveling the sidewalk think to clear the entire curb cut to the street; they usually just let people with use of their feet sort of climb over the mound of snow that has been shoveled into a mountain right where the curb cut occurs.

I am embarrassed to say that in my life I never thought about how this would affect someone using wheels for mobility, at least not until I was the personal assistant for someone with a neurodevelopmental disability who used a wheelchair. It is difficult to convey how frustrating it was for the two of us to make plans to go out, seeing mostly clear sidewalks and plowed roads, only to realize that we could not get over the curb cut at the end of a sidewalk. Sometimes we rerouted and found a new way. Sadly, other times we simply could not, and turned back.

Now at this point you may be asking yourself, who is this woman who is so angry about curb cuts, and what is her point?

Well hello there, my name is Sarah Weldy, and I am an occupational therapy student and trainee with the UIC LEND program. And for one, I want people to show some respect to the community by shoveling their sidewalks thoroughly! But more than that, I want to talk about the ADA.

The Americans with Disabilities Act was passed in 1990 and marked the beginning of accessibility in our country. There have been many positive, progressive effects of the ADA – it was a victory for it to be passed. As the ADA National Network describes: “the ADA is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, and all public and private places that are open to the general public.”

BUT –

Systemically, we see the ADA not being properly enforced. As you dive into the world of disability, you are sure to find how the follow through on this legislation has been less than enough. For example, the ADA requires accessible walkways so the city puts in curb cuts – but then doesn’t clear the opening when it snows. I am sure you can imagine a whole flurry (no pun intended) of other situations where the ADA should be able to remove physical barriers – but it extends to intellectual and developmental disabilities too! When it is expensive or inconvenient, individuals, businesses, schools, counties, and towns often simply do not put in the effort to be adherent with the ADA – whether making a ramp for a wheelchair user or giving someone extra needed time to complete a task. And I do not know about you, but until I was immersed in disability advocacy, I simply assumed that everyone was adherent!

As a future occupational therapist, I see it as my responsibility to educate people on this issue and help make change. Within my field, we heavily consider how the environment a person is in can be modified to make their life more fulfilling. Since I am not a lawyer, I will not personally be able to sue negligent organizations that are harming my clients… but I can educate clients on how to self-advocate and yes, seek legal counsel. I can write letters to my local politicians and advocacy groups when I see something wrong. And you can too, in fact, to start you off I want you to bookmark this fantastic organization, Access Living, that is Chicago-based and has a civil rights issue hotline email…with three cases cooking right now!

And lastly, you better believe I will shovel my curb cuts. Oh, will I shovel. Will you join me?

References:

Image 1:Wikipedia.org/curbcut

Image 2: cortlandstandard.net

https://adata.org/learn-about-ada

https://www.accessliving.org/our-services/legal-services/

 

The Issue of Bullying for Students with Disabilities by Rex Li, Special Ed Trainee

Many students who witness bullying believe they do not have the means or power to stop it. While they might not have been directly harmed, it still contributes to the mounting sense of fear and powerlessness in our schools. Bullying and cyber-bullying are some of the most prevalent issues throughout schools in the United States1. Although bullying does not discriminate by gender or race, it however certainly affects students with disabilities at a much higher rate than those without2. Moreover, whether a student is being bullied, participating in bullying, or is simply a bystander to a bullying occurrence, the devastating effects it causes nonetheless disrupts the overall learning environment from remaining as a place of safety and respect for all.

Despite the disproportionality in bullying towards students with disabilities, research has shown that this effect could be moderated by several factors3. Specifically, the combination of personal, school, and community factors all play a role in influencing bullying behavior and victimization rates. For example, educators who are more cognizant of disability characteristics and encourage social awareness are one of the prime influencers in reducing bullying prevalence within the classroom setting4. Furthermore, it is important for stakeholders involved with a student’s education to collaborate in fostering a culturally and socially competent environment that is inclusive of all students. Finally, professionals and caregivers can initiate this by providing children with the understanding the impact they can have on their peers and encouraging them to make a difference.

Below are some additional tips you can impart to students to prevent bullying:

·       Say “Hi” or smile at someone in the hallway.

·       Talk to someone in your class that you have never spoken with before.

·       Join your school’s anti-bullying club, if you don’t have one, start one!

·       Invite the person who is usually alone to play together or sit with your group.

To learn more about behaviors, signs, and strategies on bullying, visit the following resources:

·       StopBullying.gov

·       PACER's National Bullying Prevention Center

·       National Education Association

JOIN THE MOVEMENT

October is the National Bullying Prevention month which unites communities
nationwide to educate and raise awareness of bullying prevention.

rex2.PNG

Rex Li, M.A.

Doctoral Student, Department of Special Education

University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign


References

1Raskauskas, J., & Modell, S. (2011). Modifying anti-bullying programs to include students with disabilities. Teaching exceptional children, 44(1), 60-67.

2Rose, C. A., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). Bullying and students with disabilities: The untold narrative. Focus on Exceptional Children, 45(2), 1-10.

3Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and special education, 32(2), 114-130.

4Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational researcher, 39(1), 38-47.

5Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British journal of developmental psychology, 20(2), 259-280.

6Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of educational psychology, 91(2), 216.

7Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Haynie, D. L., Ruan, W. J., & Scheidt, P. C. (2003). Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 157(4), 348-353.

8Van der Wal, M. F., De Wit, C. A., & Hirasing, R. A. (2003). Psychosocial health among young victims and offenders of direct and indirect bullying. Pediatrics, 111(6), 1312-1317.

9Olweus, D. (2013). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 325-352). Psychology Press.

10Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231-1237.

11Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., & Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived roles of bullying in small‐town midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(4), 416-420.

Inclusive Transition Programming: Who is Really Included? by Sarah Deangelo, Special Ed Trainee

You may have heard the term “College is not for everyone…” and I suppose that really is true.  I am not here to force anyone into my preferred existence of being in school forever. I don’t believe that anyone should have to go to college if they do not want to.  I also believe that anybody who wants to go to college should have that opportunity, and that includes students with intellectual disabilities. 

              “How can that work?” you might ask.  Well let me tell you, that was probably the exact same question teachers in public elementary and secondary schools were asking in 1975 when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was passed, mandating that students with disabilities have the opportunity to be educated in public schools.  Just like much of public special education programming, college may look a little different for students with intellectual disabilities, but that doesn’t make it any less valuable. The social value of inclusion in age appropriate and natural environments for young adults with disabilities alongside their peers cannot be ignored.

              Fifteen of these programs for students with intellectual disabilities exist in the state of Illinois to date, and hopefully the number is growing.  This was made possible by the Higher Education Opportunities Act (HEOA) of 2008, which created opportunities for students with intellectual disabilities to attend institutions of higher education alongside their nondisabled peers. Students in these programs have opportunities to learn academic, vocational and daily living skills in a more inclusive environment than is offered in many other types of transition programming.

              You may now be thinking, “Well now this seems a little too good to be true,” and my answer to that would be “Well no, but also yes.”  There is no shortage of caveats to these programs.  The first being, like any college in the U.S., they cost money. How much varies, and there are some ways around this…however chances are families will end up paying at least something in some way for these programs. Another caveat is that they are somewhat exclusive.  I know that sounds counterintuitive for a whole genre of programming built on the premise of inclusivity, but unfortunately it is not inclusivity for everyone.  It is generally inclusivity for students with intellectual disabilities but no behavior problems and above a third grade reading level, so I suppose we can use the term inclusive with a bit of a grain of salt here. 

              Despite these caveats, I think these programs are really promising and really exciting.  I think they signal the start of a more inclusive future for all people with disabilities.  They may not be the pinnacle inclusive transition programming models, but they are a good start. 

Students talking about how inclusive transition programming has benefitted them.

 

For more information on college programming for students with intellectual disabilities visit

https://thinkcollege.net/

For more information on how you can access funding for these programs visit

https://lesley.edu/article/paying-for-a-transition-program